UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Charles J. SANCHEZ, Jr., Defendant-Appellant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a prosecutor’s questions were in error because they “compelled [the defendant] to give his opinion regarding the credibility of a deputy marshal”
• holding that the prosecutor committed misconduct “denigrating the defense as a sham”
• holding prosecutorial mis- conduct existed because “[i]t is improper under the guise of ‘artful cross- examination,’ to tell the jury the substance of inadmissible evidence” (quoting Hall, 989 F.2d at 716) (internal quotation marks omitted)
• finding it improper for a prosecutor to ask a defendant whether a Deputy Marshall lied when he testified
• finding it improper for a prosecutor to ask a defendant whether a Deputy Marshall lied when he testified
• finding error where the prosecutor forced the defendant to call a U.S. marshal who testified a liar

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).