Washington Supreme Court· 1/30/2003

State v. O'Neill

Citations

148 Wash. 2d 564
62 P.3d 489
2003 Wash. LEXIS 71

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that where a trial court’s “findings are unchallenged, they are verities on appeal”
“There must be an actual custodial arrest to provide the ‘authority’ of law justifying a warrantless search incident to arrest under article I, section 7.”
no valid arrest had occurred, despite probable cause to justify one, to support search incident to arrest
knowledge of the right to refuse consent is not a prerequisite of voluntary consent when the subject is not in police custody
no seizure when police officer asked the driver of a parked car,\ 'Where is the pipe?'\ after seeing a flicker of light
occupant not seized when officer asked him to roll down the window, asked him to try to start his vehicle, then asked for identification

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chambers, Madsen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

152 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

93 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named State v. O'Neill

52 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.