Skip to main content

State v. Hill

Citations

  • 870 P.2d 313
  • 123 Wash. 2d 641
  • 1994 Wash. LEXIS 195

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing general principle ■ that \officers have no authority under a premises warrant to search personal effects an individual is wearing or holding\
  • discussing the instruction with approval in part because the words “or an accomplice” were added only to the elements concerning cause of death, not the elements concerning intent
  • rejecting line of authority permitting appellate courts to undertake independent review of the evidence
  • rejecting line of authority permitting appellate courts to undertake independent review of the evidence
  • rejecting line of authority permitting appellate courts to undertake independent review of the evidence
  • rejecting line of authority permitting appellate courts to undertake independent review of the evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brachtenbach

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

345 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.