Ohio Court of Appeals· 1/30/2025
State v. O'Neill
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 287
Syllabus
Defendant's constitutional rights were not of sufficient magnitude to outweigh the victim's statutory and constitutional rights. Under a due process analysis, defendant's stated reasons for the medical records did not show that the records were material to his defense.
Judges: Hendrickson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court· 1985-07-02· cited 8,539×
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court· 1976-06-24· cited 6,537×
- Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court· 1987-02-24· cited 2,521×
- State v. LaMarOhio Supreme Court· 2002-05-15· cited 477×
- State v. JohnstonOhio Supreme Court· 1988-10-05· cited 376×
- State v. WicklineOhio Supreme Court· 1990-04-11· cited 301×
- State v. WidmerOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-01-14· cited 54×
- State v. GloverOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-05-05· cited 21×
- State v. RugglesOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-05-11· cited 18×
- Torres Friedenberg v. Friedenberg (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-06-18· cited 15×
- R.S./s.E. v. Hon. thompson/teddy VandersArizona Supreme Court· 2021-04-29· cited 15×
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2014-10-22· cited 8×
- State v. KelleyOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-01-18· cited 7×
- State v. CountsOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-10-13· cited 5×
- Lane Draper v. Hon. gentry/state/nezArizona Supreme Court· 2023-07-31· cited 5×
- State v. O'NeillOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-02-09· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.