Washington Supreme Court· 10/11/2007

State v. Day

Citations

168 P.3d 1265

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

explaining that “Terry has also been extended to traffic infractions, ‘due to the law enforcement exigency created by the ready mobility of vehicles’ ” (quoting State v. Johnson, 128 Wn.2d 431, 454, 909 P.2d 293 (1996)); State v. Patterson, 112 Wn.2d 731, 774 P.2d 10 (1989
declining to allow an investigative stop under Terry for parking infractions
\[O]ur state constitution . . . requires actual authority of law before the State may disturb the individual's private affairs.\
“[0]ur state constitution . . . requires actual authority of law before the State may disturb the individual’s private affairs.”
the famous footnote four introduced the idea of different levels of judicial review
evidence in open or plain view will not be excluded

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chambers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.