Skip to main content

State v. Oneill

Citations

  • 256 Or. App. 537
  • 303 P.3d 944
  • 2013 WL 2100482
  • 2013 Ore. App. LEXIS 531

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • determining that defendant was not entitled to choice-of-evils instruction in Cite as 345 Or App 26 (2025) 29 escape case, not due to a warrant but because defendant’s perception of immediate threat was not reasonable
  • defendant was not entitled to a choice-of-evils instruction where the only evidence offered to support a choice-of-evils instruction was that defendant’s personal history caused her to believe the threatened injury was imminent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nakamoto, Schuman, Wollheim

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.