Skip to main content

State v. O'Neill

Citations

  • 134 N.H. 182
  • 589 A.2d 999
  • 1991 N.H. LEXIS 51
  • 1991 WL 64045

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that similar standard of review applies in criminal and civil cases
  • testimony that defendant “stuck his fingers in my bum” insufficient to support penetration of anus.
  • prosecutor failed to show that “bum” meant something other than dictionary definition
  • no demonstrative aid used to clarify child victim’s testimony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Horton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.