Skip to main content

State v. Soto

Citations

  • 378 N.W.2d 625
  • 1985 Minn. LEXIS 1240

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting the reasoning of Cass and Home because, although Massachusetts and South Carolina are “common law states,” Minnesota is a “code state”
  • “It does not follow that because we held ... that next of kin might recover damages arising out of the destruction of a viable fetus in a civil action ..., that a viable fetus is a ‘human being’ for purposes of the criminal law”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kelley, Yetka, Peterson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

53 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.