Skip to main content

State v. Cox

Citations

  • 798 N.W.2d 517
  • 2011 Minn. LEXIS 320
  • 2011 WL 2340533

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that when a party cannot show that they are similarly situated to an individual being treated differently, the party’s equal protection claim necessarily fails
  • recognizing the Board failed to prove an attorney’s conduct violated this rule when it would be speculative to conclude the attorney’s actions were solely for his convenience or for an unreasonable purpose
  • \[T]he Equal Protection Clause ... keeps governmental decisionmakers from treating differently persons who are in all relevant respects alike.\
  • \[T]he Equal Protection Clause ... keeps governmental decisionmakers from treating differently persons who are in all relevant respects alike.\ (citation omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anderson, Consideration, Gildea, Meyer, Paul, Stras, Took

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

49 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.