Supreme Court of Minnesota· 8/23/2001

State v. Lindsey

Citations

632 N.W.2d 652
2001 Minn. LEXIS 549
2001 WL 952719

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that the district court did not abuse its discretion by ordering an indigent prison inmate to pay $32,682.93 in restitution
explaining that not all courtroom restrictions implicate a defendant’s right to a public trial
applying a “triviality standard” and concluding that no violation of the right to a public trial occurred
finding no abuse of discretion for failure to consider defendant’s ability to pay where the trial court ordered an indigent defendant to pay $32,682.93 in restitution using prison wages
blanket exclusion of children, which led to removal of two children of unknown age and unknown relationship to the accused
“The legislature has the power to declare what acts are criminal and to establish the punishment for those acts as part of the substantive law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Page

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

44 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.