State v. Pflepsen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that court of appeals had authority to treat improper notice of appeal as petition for writ of prohibition
• recognizing that “testimony and statements recorded in hearing and trial transcripts are often imprecise and unclear with respect to sentencing and conviction orders”
• holding that it was error not to impose restitution due to pending civil damages lawsuit
• explaining that a conviction appearing in the official judgment of conviction or conviction order entered by the court has been formally adjudicated
• stating that modification of a restitution obligation after a defendant’s probationary period has expired is not permitted because no statute or rule authorizes such a modification
• stating that modification of a restitution obligation after a defendant's probationary period has expired is not permitted because no statute or rule authorizes such a modification

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).