Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Oregon Supreme Court· 5/16/2002

Delgado v. Souders

Citations

  • 46 P.3d 729
  • 334 Or. 122
  • 2002 Ore. LEXIS 367

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that Rangel elimi- nates overbreadth concerns relating to civil stalking stat- ute, ORS 30.866(1)
  • explaining that a party who limited his vagueness claim to a lack of fair notice had a claim only under the Due Process Clause
  • concluding “that plaintiff presented sufficient evidence to establish all the elements required to obtain an SPO”
  • noting that parties may prove elements of their civil claims through reasonable inferences
  • reviewing for legal error ruling that evidence was insufficient to support inference for which it was proffered
  • affirming an SPO where the record did not indicate that the respondent had a history of violence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carson, Gillette, Durham, Leeson, Riggs

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

63 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

43 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Delgado v. Souders

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.