Supreme Court of Kansas· 5/29/1998
State v. Mitchell
Citations
- 960 P.2d 200
- 265 Kan. 238
- 1998 Kan. LEXIS 365
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the duration of a traffic stop was unreasonable when, after the officer obtained enough information to issue the citation, the officer began to question the motorist about drug-related offenses
- permitting questioning “during the time it takes to insure the driver has no warrants and the car is not stolen”
- although the extension of a stop may be very short, the extension is unconstitutional if it lasts beyond the length necessary for its legitimate purpose
- To justify a temporary detention for questioning during a routine traffic stop, the officer must have reasonable suspicion of illegal transactions in drugs or of any other serious crime.
- traffic stop an investigatory detention; reasonableness of investigative detention determined by whether officer's action was [1] justified at inception and [2] reasonably related in scope to the circumstances which justified interference in the first place
- traffic stop an investigatory detention; reasonableness of investigative detention determined by whether officer’s action was [1] justified at inception and [2] reasonably related in scope to the circumstances which justified interference in the first place
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lockett
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Kansas· 2007-09-07· cited 203×
- Martin v. Kansas Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Kansas· 2008-02-01· cited 136×
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Kansas· 2014-08-29· cited 105×
- State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Kansas· 2006-06-09· cited 68×
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas· 2008-05-30· cited 66×
- Commonwealth v. FeyenordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2005-09-02· cited 65×
- State v. MartinSupreme Court of Kansas· 2008-03-28· cited 51×
- People v. WhiteAppellate Court of Illinois· 2002-05-24· cited 29×
- State v. Diaz-RuizCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2009-07-17· cited 17×
- State v. GolstonCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2009-03-13· cited 17×
- State v. GoffCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2010-09-17· cited 16×
- State v. SchneiderCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2003-12-24· cited 16×
- City of Norton v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2003-06-13· cited 12×
- State v. GrossCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2008-06-06· cited 11×
- State v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2008-04-25· cited 9×
- State v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2005-09-16· cited 9×
- State v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2010-11-12· cited 8×
- State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2012-06-29· cited 8×
- State v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2005-12-23· cited 7×
- State v. MorlockCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2008-08-29· cited 6×
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- United States v. SharpeSupreme Court· 1985-03-20· cited 2,970×
- United States v. Mateen Yusuf Shabazz, A/K/A Edward L. Eberhart, A/K/A Edward Wallace, and Keith Lamar ParkerFifth Circuit· 1993-06-04· cited 480×
- United States v. Carlos Botero-OspinaTenth Circuit· 1995-12-05· cited 417×
- United States v. Jose Luis Guzman and Sonia Cruz-LazoTenth Circuit· 1988-12-30· cited 381×
- United States v. Ralph Joseph WalkerTenth Circuit· 1991-08-13· cited 167×
- State v. VandiverSupreme Court of Kansas· 1995-03-10· cited 79×
- State v. GriffinSupreme Court of Kansas· 1990-03-02· cited 39×
- Douds v. International Longshoremen's Ass'nSecond Circuit· 1957-03-15· cited 29×
- Bolyard ex rel. Bolyard v. Kansas Department of Social & Rehabilitation ServicesSupreme Court of Kansas· 1996-03-08· cited 29×
- Sharp v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas· 1989-12-08· cited 15×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.