Sharp v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• refusing to recognize Bivens action under Thirteenth Amendment against State of Kansas
• “A legal theory may not be asserted for the first time on appeal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Lindenman v. Umscheid
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1994-06-03· cited 100×
• State v. Mitchell
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1998-05-29· cited 48×
• Prager v. Kansas Dept. of Revenue
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2001-03-23· cited 42×
• Jackson v. City of Kansas City
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1997-10-31· cited 29×
• Bolyard ex rel. Bolyard v. Kansas Department of Social & Rehabilitation Services
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1996-03-08· cited 29×
• State v. Ponce
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1995-12-08· cited 18×
• Brooks v. Sauceda
  D. Kansas· 2000-01-05· cited 14×
• Gross v. Capital Electric Line Builders, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1993-10-29· cited 13×
• Youngblood v. Qualls
  D. Kansas· 2018-04-06· cited 13×
• Gilmore v. McKune
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1997-05-30· cited 11×
• Sharp v. State
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1992-02-28· cited 4×