Supreme Court of Kansas· 9/7/2007
State v. Thompson
Citations
- 166 P.3d 1015
- 284 Kan. 763
- 2007 Kan. LEXIS 487
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding motorist encounter was consensual and not a seizure, even though emergency lights were activated, they were used as a safety measure and “not [as] a clear show of authority[]”
- holding Kansas state courts are not required to follow decisions of federal circuit courts
- noting numerous scholars’ cri- tiques that consent searches after routine traffic stops are inherently coercive
- telling driver to have a nice day “was no unequivocal signal that he was free to go”
- finding voluntary encounter where officer's conduct conveys to a reasonable person that he was free to refuse the officers' requests or otherwise terminate the encounter
- finding voluntary encounter where officer's conduct conveys to a reasonable person that he was free to refuse the officers' requests or otherwise terminate the encounter
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Luckert, Beier, Johnson, Larson, Rosen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
92 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Vontress v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas· 2014-05-30· cited 146×
- State v. OvermanSupreme Court of Kansas· 2015-04-17· cited 139×
- State v. HankeSupreme Court of Kansas· 2018-04-20· cited 122×
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Kansas· 2014-08-29· cited 105×
- State v. PollmanSupreme Court of Kansas· 2008-08-08· cited 91×
- State v. ReissSupreme Court of Kansas· 2014-05-02· cited 87×
- State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Kansas· 2008-12-05· cited 85×
- State v. SharpSupreme Court of Kansas· 2009-06-19· cited 81×
- City of Atwood v. PianaltoSupreme Court of Kansas· 2015-05-22· cited 72×
- State v. RichardSupreme Court of Kansas· 2014-09-05· cited 67×
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas· 2008-05-30· cited 66×
- State v. JamesSupreme Court of Kansas· 2015-05-08· cited 66×
- State v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-09-07· cited 59×
- State v. HenningSupreme Court of Kansas· 2009-06-26· cited 54×
- State v. BerrySupreme Court of Kansas· 2011-07-22· cited 53×
- State v. SandersSupreme Court of Kansas· 2019-07-26· cited 49×
- State v. HillardSupreme Court of Kansas· 2022-06-10· cited 49×
- State v. DanielSupreme Court of Kansas· 2010-11-19· cited 45×
- State v. JeffersonSupreme Court of Kansas· 2013-09-06· cited 39×
- State v. KeenanSupreme Court of Kansas· 2016-08-19· cited 36×
Cites
85 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1963-01-14· cited 12,871×
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court· 1973-05-29· cited 11,783×
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court· 1961-10-09· cited 9,088×
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1996-05-15· cited 7,105×
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court· 1983-03-23· cited 6,728×
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court· 1980-06-30· cited 6,313×
- County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court· 1998-05-26· cited 6,212×
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court· 1979-03-27· cited 5,549×
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court· 1984-07-02· cited 4,856×
- Florida v. BostickSupreme Court· 1991-06-20· cited 4,435×
- United States v. ArvizuSupreme Court· 2002-01-15· cited 3,936×
- United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 3,736×
- California v. Hodari D.Supreme Court· 1991-04-23· cited 3,670×
- Ohio v. RobinetteSupreme Court· 1996-11-18· cited 2,025×
- Illinois v. CaballesSupreme Court· 2005-01-24· cited 2,007×
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. DelgadoSupreme Court· 1984-04-17· cited 1,950×
- Brendlin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 2007-06-18· cited 1,523×
- Michigan v. ChesternutSupreme Court· 1988-06-13· cited 1,499×
- Brower Ex Rel. Estate of Caldwell v. County of InyoSupreme Court· 1989-03-21· cited 1,476×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.