Supreme Court of Kansas· 8/29/2014
State v. Jones
Citations
- 300 Kan. 630
- 333 P.3d 886
- 2014 Kan. LEXIS 495
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that cut-off baggie comers are often used for packaging illegal substances
- noting that clear baggies have \a multitude of innocent uses\
- finding presence of empty baggie insufficient to form reasonable suspicion of criminal activity
- \a traffic stop is not rendered invalid by the fact that it is 'a mere pretext for a narcotics search'\
- as a general rule, review of district court's ruling on motion to suppress must be based solely on evidence presented at suppression hearing
- as a general rule, review of district court's ruling on motion to suppress must be based solely on evidence presented at suppression hearing
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Luckert, Moritz
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Fuller v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas· 2015-12-23· cited 164×
- State of Iowa v. Scottize Danyelle BrownSupreme Court of Iowa· 2019-06-28· cited 135×
- State v. MendezSupreme Court of Kansas· 2024-11-27· cited 109×
- State v. CashSupreme Court of Kansas· 2021-04-02· cited 42×
- State v. LowerySupreme Court of Kansas· 2018-06-22· cited 30×
- State v. KraemerCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2016-04-29· cited 30×
- Schreiner v. HodgeSupreme Court of Kansas· 2022-02-18· cited 14×
- State v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2014-12-05· cited 11×
- State v. KnightCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2018-05-18· cited 11×
- Jarvis v. Kansas Dept. of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2019-05-10· cited 11×
- State v. VasquezCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2016-04-29· cited 11×
- State v. MartinSupreme Court of Kansas· 2024-03-15· cited 10×
- State v. FlackSupreme Court of Kansas· 2024-01-19· cited 9×
- State v. Arceo-RojasCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2020-02-07· cited 7×
- State v. LutzSupreme Court of Kansas· 2020-11-06· cited 6×
- State Ex Rel. Geary Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't v. One 2008 Toyota TundraCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2018-02-23· cited 4×
- City of Leawood v. PuccinelliCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2018-06-22· cited 4×
- State v. ArrizabalagaSupreme Court of Kansas· 2021-04-30· cited 4×
- State v. ArrizabalagaCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2019-07-26· cited 3×
- State v. LeesCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2018-11-16· cited 2×
Cites
33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1996-06-10· cited 7,197×
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1996-05-15· cited 7,105×
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court· 1981-01-21· cited 5,975×
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court· 1984-07-02· cited 4,856×
- United States v. SokolowSupreme Court· 1989-04-03· cited 4,647×
- Illinois v. WardlowSupreme Court· 2000-01-19· cited 4,162×
- United States v. ArvizuSupreme Court· 2002-01-15· cited 3,936×
- United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court· 1973-12-11· cited 3,538×
- Pennsylvania v. MimmsSupreme Court· 1977-12-05· cited 3,269×
- United States v. SharpeSupreme Court· 1985-03-20· cited 2,970×
- Illinois v. CaballesSupreme Court· 2005-01-24· cited 2,007×
- Arizona v. JohnsonSupreme Court· 2009-01-26· cited 1,709×
- State v. WardSupreme Court of Kansas· 2011-07-29· cited 1,316×
- United States v. Terry L. WoodTenth Circuit· 1997-02-07· cited 340×
- United States v. WilliamsTenth Circuit· 2001-11-28· cited 212×
- State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Kansas· 2007-09-07· cited 203×
- State v. DeMarcoSupreme Court of Kansas· 1998-01-23· cited 164×
- State v. BoleynSupreme Court of Kansas· 2013-06-14· cited 138×
- Snider v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Kansas· 2013-04-19· cited 109×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.