Court of Appeals of Kansas· 9/17/2010
State v. Goff
Citations
- 239 P.3d 467
- 44 Kan. App. 2d 536
- 2010 Kan. App. LEXIS 107
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The smell of raw marijuana alone is sufficient to give an officer both reasonable suspicion and probable cause.”
- \The trial court had to have found the officer's testimony that he smelled marijuana was credible to have found the officer had probable cause.\
- odor of raw marijuana is sufficient by itself to establish probable cause to search a vehicle
- \The smell of raw marijuana alone is sufficient to give an officer both reasonable suspicion and probable cause.\
- officer smelled the odor of marijuana during traffic stop which provided probable cause to search
- The odor of raw marijuana alone is sufficient to give an officer reasonable suspicion and probable cause to search.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hill, P.J., Pierron and Leben
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State of Iowa v. Alan Lee Watts, Jr.Supreme Court of Iowa· 2011-08-19· cited 74×
- State v. StevensonSupreme Court of Kansas· 2014-03-28· cited 70×
- Gregory W. Zullo v. State of VermontSupreme Court of Vermont· 2019-01-04· cited 21×
- State v. HadleyCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2017-12-22· cited 6×
- In re Marriage of L.F. and M.F.Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2025-01-03· cited 3×
- State v. StevensonCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2011-09-16· cited 2×
- State v. GillCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2019-06-21
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court· 1984-07-02· cited 4,856×
- Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court· 1977-01-25· cited 2,680×
- State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Kansas· 2007-09-07· cited 203×
- Hodges v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas· 2009-01-30· cited 115×
- State v. WalkerSupreme Court of Kansas· 2007-03-23· cited 109×
- State v. MooreSupreme Court of Kansas· 2007-03-16· cited 101×
- State v. WoolvertonSupreme Court of Kansas· 2007-06-08· cited 100×
- State v. FewellSupreme Court of Kansas· 2008-05-30· cited 84×
- State v. HillSupreme Court of Kansas· 2006-03-17· cited 67×
- State v. MacDonaldSupreme Court of Kansas· 1993-07-09· cited 59×
- State v. MitchellSupreme Court of Kansas· 1998-05-29· cited 48×
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Kansas· 2007-02-09· cited 48×
- McKenney v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2007-08-09· cited 19×
- State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2003-10-17· cited 11×
- State v. VanekCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2008-04-18· cited 11×
- State v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2008-04-25· cited 9×
- State v. KirkCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2008-11-21· cited 6×
- State v. FewellCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2007-03-02· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.