Skip to main content

State v. Martin

Citations

  • 179 P.3d 457
  • 285 Kan. 994
  • 2008 Kan. LEXIS 72

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • suggesting officers’ encounter with defendant was justified, in part, on defendant’s misfortune of being in “immediate vicinity of the uri-nator” whose actions drew officers to area
  • applying the Brown factors but noting that temporal proximity, while “it weights heavily against the State[,]” is not dispositive, given an intervening warrant and the lack of purposeful police misconduct
  • noting that no single factor is dispositive
  • noting that no single factor is dispositive
  • noting that no single factor is dispositive
  • noting that no single factor is dispositive

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.