Arizona Supreme Court· 4/4/1984

State v. Mincey

Citations

687 P.2d 1180
141 Ariz. 425
1984 Ariz. LEXIS 221

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

explaining that evidence of premeditation was admissible when defendant was retried solely for second-degree murder after his first-degree murder conviction was vacated
affirming denial of defendant’s motion for change of judge for cause where judge had voluntarily recused from sentencing, refused to recuse from motion for new trial, and then withdrew voluntary recusal after reading defendant’s motion
informal conversation between judge and media and receipt of ex parte communications concerning sentencing did not require disqualification
a defendant's general character, age, health, attitude, moral character, and prior criminal record or lack thereof are valid considerations
no error found due to unnamed unknown parties’ statements to judge to be tough when sentencing because comments did not address factual matters or suggest sentences
“Once a privilege has been waived, and confidentiality lost, it may not be reasserted.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gordon, Holohan, Hays, Cameron, Feldman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

53 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

49 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.