Skip to main content

State v. Tison

Citations

  • 633 P.2d 355
  • 129 Ariz. 546
  • 1981 Ariz. LEXIS 217

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying standard from Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (1979), to consider 20 whether evidence was insufficient to support conviction
  • court held that co-felon/father’s influence over his sons did not constitute a mitigating factor for them
  • In reviewing for sufficiency of evidence, “[t]he test to be applied is whether there is substantial evidence to support a guilty verdict.”
  • In reviewing for sufficiency of evidence, “[t]he test to be applied is whether there is substantial evidence to support a guilty verdict.”
  • In reviewing for sufficiency of evidence, “[t]he test to be applied is whether there is substantial evidence to support a guilty verdict.”
  • In reviewing for sufficiency of evidence, “[t]he test to be applied is whether there is substantial evidence to support a guilty verdict.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Struckmeyer, Holohan, Hays, Cameron, Gordon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

77 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

64 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.