Court of Appeals of Arizona· 12/7/1998

State v. Harrison

Citations

985 P.2d 513
195 Ariz. 28

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

affirming conviction for aggravated assault under Ariz. Stat. § 13-1204 where law enforcement officers sustained “minor physical injuries”
we afford broad discretion to the superior court in weighing probative value against the danger of unfair prejudice
“The trial court is in the best position to balance the probative value of challenged evidence against its potential for unfair prejudice.”
“The trial court is in the best position to balance the probative value of challenged evidence against its potential for unfair prejudice.”
“The trial court is in the best position to balance the probative value of challenged evidence against its potential for unfair prejudice. Thus, it has broad discretion in deciding the admissibility.”
“The trial court is in the best position to balance the probative value of challenged evidence against its potential for unfair prejudice. Thus, it has broad discretion in deciding the admissibility.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Weisberg, Noyes, Voss

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.