Skip to main content
· 1/17/1992

State v. Bratt

Citations

  • 824 P.2d 983
  • 250 Kan. 264
  • 1992 Kan. LEXIS 33

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment requires prosecution to either produce or prove unavailability of a declarant before hearsay statements can be admitted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lockett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.