Supreme Court of Minnesota· 5/12/2005

State v. Martin

Citations

695 N.W.2d 578
2005 Minn. LEXIS 267
2005 WL 1118073

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that Crawford “announced a new test for the admissibility of those statements that are ‘testimonial’ but left the Roberts test in place for nontestimonial statements”
noting Martin's concession \that ten of the fourteen contacts [from the jury] concerned housekeeping matters\
discussing Martin’s original arguments and preserving the issues for possible postconviction review
discussing Martin's original arguments and preserving the issues for possible postconviction review
“While the defendant can waive his right to be present at a stage of trial, the decision to waive the right is not for counsel to make but a personal decision for defendant to make after consultation with counsel.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
applying plain error analysis to Confrontation Clause issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Meyer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.