Skip to main content

State v. McClendon

Citations

  • 131 Wash. 2d 853

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding 1995 amendment to RCW 46.61.5055 prospective only, and deciding double jeopardy challenge to preamendment version of statute
  • holding 1995 amendment to RCW 46.61.5055 prospective only, and deciding double jeopardy challenge to pre-amendment version of statute
  • legislature’s use of future and present tenses in an amendment strengthens a presumption that it is prospective only
  • legislature's use of future and present tenses in an amendment strengthens a presumption that it is prospective only

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Alexander, Sanders, Smith, Talmadge

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

45 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

73 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named State v. McClendon

52 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.