State v. McClendon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• case remanded for determination of whether reasonable continuance and treatment would permit accused to recover memory

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Berry
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1966-10-19· cited 74×
• State v. McClendon
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1968-02-07· cited 48×
• State v. Tillery
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1971-02-19· cited 26×
• State v. Michael
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1968-02-01· cited 23×
• State v. Gonzales
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1974-06-10· cited 22×
• French v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1979-09-21· cited 11×
• McWilliams v. Justice Court, Tucson Precinct No. 1
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1967-03-07· cited 5×
• Morrow v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1980-12-10· cited 5×
• People v. McBroom
  California Court of Appeal· 1968-07-22· cited 5×
• State v. Nielsen
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1972-04-14· cited 4×
• Carter v. State ex rel. Eyman
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1967-03-08· cited 2×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Malloy v. Hogan
  Supreme Court· 1964-06-15· cited 3,675×
• Brown v. New Jersey
  Supreme Court· 1899-11-20· cited 219×
• Richard Saunders v. Raymond J. Buckhoe, Warden, State House of Correction and Branch Prison, Marquette, Michigan
  Sixth Circuit· 1965-06-10· cited 5×
• Hudgens v. Clark
  D. Oregon· 1963-04-11· cited 5×
• United States ex rel. Priore v. Fay
  S.D. New York· 1964-07-22· cited 3×