Washington Supreme Court· 12/7/1995

State v. Cole

Citations

906 P.2d 925
128 Wash. 2d 262
1995 Wash. LEXIS 248

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

dissent concluded forfeitures were punishment and held that under Blockburger test, forfeiture was barred, since it required proof of criminal violation
where the court concluded the threshold requirement of multiple punishments was lacking, other prongs of double jeopardy analysis (i.e., \same offense\) were not addressed
forfeiture of traceable proceeds is not punishment for purposes of Fifth Amendment's double jeopardy clause
forfeiture of traceable proceeds is not punishment for purposes of Fifth Amendment’s double jeopardy clause
smell of growing marijuana, by itself, sufficient to establish probable cause for search warrant
smell of growing marijuana, by itself, sufficient to establish probable cause for search warrant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Alexander, Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

73 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

58 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.