Washington Supreme Court· 5/1/1997
State v. McClendon
Citations
- 935 P.2d 1334
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding 1995 amendment to RCW 46.61.5055 prospective only, and deciding double jeopardy challenge to preamendment version of statute
- holding 1995 amendment to RCW 46.61.5055 prospective only, and deciding double jeopardy challenge to pre-amendment version of statute
- legislature’s use of future and present tenses in an amendment strengthens a presumption that it is prospective only
- legislature's use of future and present tenses in an amendment strengthens a presumption that it is prospective only
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
45 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Amunrud v. Board of AppealsWashington Supreme Court· 2006-09-21· cited 143×
- Densley v. Department of Retirement SystemsWashington Supreme Court· 2007-11-15· cited 105×
- State v. JeffersonWashington Supreme Court· 2018-11-01· cited 98×
- State v. ShultzWashington Supreme Court· 1999-07-29· cited 79×
- State v. TKWashington Supreme Court· 2003-07-01· cited 75×
- State v. T.K.Washington Supreme Court· 1999-10-14· cited 73×
- Faciszewski v. BrownWashington Supreme Court· 2016-12-22· cited 54×
- State v. CatlettWashington Supreme Court· 1997-10-16· cited 45×
- Brown v. Department of HealthCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1998-12-17· cited 42×
- Harris v. CharlesWashington Supreme Court· 2011-05-12· cited 41×
- Michel v. City of RichlandCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1998-01-22· cited 28×
- Pettis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1999-12-20· cited 28×
- State v. BurnellSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-03-24· cited 27×
- City of Seattle v. LongWashington Supreme Court· 2021-08-12· cited 27×
- State v. MunguiaCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2001-07-19· cited 23×
- American Discount Corp. v. ShepherdWashington Supreme Court· 2007-04-19· cited 17×
- Westmark Development Corp. v. City of BurienCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2007-09-04· cited 16×
- City of Walla Walla v. TopelCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2001-02-08· cited 15×
- State v. SellCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2002-04-01· cited 14×
- State v. PriceSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-12-14· cited 13×
Cites
74 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. HalperSupreme Court· 1989-05-15· cited 1,945×
- Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 1,908×
- United States v. UrserySupreme Court· 1996-06-24· cited 1,314×
- Michigan Department of State Police v. SitzSupreme Court· 1990-06-14· cited 1,275×
- Breed v. JonesSupreme Court· 1975-05-27· cited 1,196×
- State v. GunwallWashington Supreme Court· 1986-06-12· cited 1,052×
- Department of Revenue of Mont. v. Kurth RanchSupreme Court· 1994-06-06· cited 1,050×
- United States v. WardSupreme Court· 1980-08-22· cited 969×
- United States v. One Assortment of 89 FirearmsSupreme Court· 1984-02-22· cited 720×
- United States v. $405,089.23 U.S. Currency, Charles Arlt James Wren Payback Mines, Claimants-AppellantsNinth Circuit· 1994-09-06· cited 354×
- State v. CalleWashington Supreme Court· 1995-01-26· cited 348×
- State v. GockenWashington Supreme Court· 1995-06-22· cited 214×
- State v. GustafsonOhio Supreme Court· 1996-07-30· cited 205×
- In Re F.D. Processing, Inc.Washington Supreme Court· 1992-07-23· cited 159×
- United States v. $405,089.23 U.S. Currency, Charles Arlt, James Wren, Payback Mines, Claimants-AppellantsNinth Circuit· 1995-05-30· cited 152×
- State v. HigaHawaii Supreme Court· 1995-05-17· cited 150×
- O'DAY v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court· 1988-01-21· cited 139×
- Miebach v. ColasurdoWashington Supreme Court· 1984-06-28· cited 139×
- State v. ColeWashington Supreme Court· 1995-12-07· cited 138×
- State v. WetheredWashington Supreme Court· 1988-05-12· cited 138×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.