In Re F.D. Processing, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that even if the amendment were remedial it could not be given retroactive effect because it affected a perfected security interest which is a vested right
• a remedial amendment is applied retroactively when it relates to practice, procedure or remedies
• ”[T]he comments of a single legislator are generally considered inadequate to establish legislative intent.” (citing Yakima v. International Ass’n of Fire Fighters, Local 469, 117 Wash.2d 655, 818 P.2d 1076 (1991
• \[T]he comments of a single legislator are generally considered inadequate to establish legislative intent.\
• in action relating to statute extending lien protection to agricultural processors, preamendment version of statute governs because amendment to definition of agricultural products affected bank's vested right in a security interest and, therefore, not retroactively applied

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).