Michel v. City of Richland

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that, “[a]lthough no Washington case has specifically ruled on the subject, it is doubtful that alcoholics would be considered a suspect class” because “[t]here is no history of ‘invidious discrimination’ against alcoholics that must be rigorously prevented.”
• Division Three found the inclusion of a deferred prosecution as a “prior offense” did not violate due process or equal protection

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).