State v. McClendon
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 1441
Syllabus
Appeal of conviction for tampering with evidence and possession. During search warrant, police found evidence that the defendant flushed narcotics down toilet. Defendant aware of official investigation. Police loudly announced presence. Defendant destroyed evidence with the purpose to impair investigation. Defendant was out of breath, police recovered crack cocaine on bathroom floor, water droplets strewn around the toilet suggested frenetic attempt to flush narcotics. Counsel not ineffective for failing to move to suppress evidence where defendant presented no basis for the evidence to be suppressed.
Judges: Byrne
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court· 1991-07-31· cited 11,342×
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1979-01-15· cited 6,103×
- Alderman v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1969-03-24· cited 2,470×
- State v. RobinetteOhio Supreme Court· 1997-11-12· cited 619×
- State v. ColemanOhio Supreme Court· 1989-09-20· cited 203×
- State v. JonesOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-01-22· cited 192×
- State v. BrownOhio Supreme Court· 2007-10-03· cited 184×
- State v. BlankenburgOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-03-26· cited 99×
- State v. BrownOhio Supreme Court· 2015-06-23· cited 53×
- State v. PetitOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-02-21· cited 30×
- State v. BillingsleyOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-04-27· cited 28×
- State v. BradenOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-08-04· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.