Supreme Court of Kansas· 10/27/2006
State v. Francis
Citations
- 145 P.3d 48
- 282 Kan. 120
- 2006 Kan. LEXIS 653
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding admission of gun found at defendant's house possibly used by defendant to commit murder was not unfairly prejudicial because it was not designed to elicit an emotional response from jury
- applying new United States Supreme Court precedent on search and seizure to permit admission of evidence
- \Brady suppression occurs even when the government fails to turn over evidence that is not known to the prosecutor if it is known to police\
- defendant precluded from raising issue regarding admission of evidence pursuant to K.S.A. 60-455 because defendant failed to object to evidence at trial
- defendant precluded from raising issue regarding admission of evidence pursuant to K.S.A. 60-455 because defendant failed to object to evidence at trial
- defendant precluded from raising issue regarding the admission of evidence pursuant to K.S.A. 60-455 because defendant failed to object to evidence at trial
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Allegrucci
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. MontoyaNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2015-03-12· cited 383×
- State v. MontoyaNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2015-03-12· cited 311×
- State v. HiltSupreme Court of Kansas· 2014-04-18· cited 137×
- State v. CarrSupreme Court of Kansas· 2014-07-25· cited 125×
- Biglow v. EidenbergSupreme Court of Kansas· 2018-08-24· cited 124×
- State v. WARRIORSupreme Court of Kansas· 2012-05-11· cited 121×
- State v. HirshSupreme Court of Kansas· 2019-08-02· cited 97×
- State v. HartSupreme Court of Kansas· 2013-06-07· cited 86×
- State v. HolmanSupreme Court of Kansas· 2012-08-24· cited 81×
- State v. VasquezSupreme Court of Kansas· 2008-10-17· cited 78×
- State v. RiojasSupreme Court of Kansas· 2009-03-27· cited 78×
- State v. GaonaSupreme Court of Kansas· 2012-03-02· cited 70×
- State v. ThurberSupreme Court of Kansas· 2018-06-15· cited 55×
- State v. CoonesSupreme Court of Kansas· 2014-12-12· cited 52×
- In re L.M.Supreme Court of Kansas· 2008-06-20· cited 52×
- State v. SeacatSupreme Court of Kansas· 2016-01-15· cited 50×
- State v. CrumSupreme Court of Kansas· 2008-05-16· cited 49×
- State v. HillardSupreme Court of Kansas· 2022-06-10· cited 49×
- State v. AdamsSupreme Court of Kansas· 2012-04-06· cited 48×
- State v. CarapezzaSupreme Court of Kansas· 2008-08-22· cited 47×
Cites
60 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court· 2004-10-01· cited 23,210×
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court· 1978-06-26· cited 8,679×
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1972-02-24· cited 7,003×
- Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court· 1995-04-19· cited 6,003×
- Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1987-01-13· cited 3,380×
- Marron v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1927-11-21· cited 1,400×
- Andresen v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1976-06-29· cited 1,306×
- Hudson v. MichiganSupreme Court· 2006-06-15· cited 1,222×
- Stanford v. TexasSupreme Court· 1965-03-01· cited 948×
- Steele v. United States No. 1Supreme Court· 1925-04-13· cited 727×
- Youngblood v. West VirginiaSupreme Court· 2006-06-19· cited 288×
- State v. HolmesSupreme Court of Kansas· 2004-12-17· cited 161×
- United States v. Thomas James SavocaSixth Circuit· 1985-05-03· cited 158×
- State v. LumleySupreme Court of Kansas· 1999-03-05· cited 109×
- State v. MaysSupreme Court of Kansas· 2004-03-19· cited 107×
- State v. AikinsSupreme Court of Kansas· 1997-01-24· cited 102×
- State v. WarrenSupreme Court of Kansas· 1981-11-09· cited 91×
- State v. HunterSupreme Court of Kansas· 1987-07-17· cited 87×
- State v. LittleTennessee Supreme Court· 1978-01-03· cited 87×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.