Skip to main content

State v. Overstreet

Citations

  • 200 P.3d 427
  • 288 Kan. 1
  • 2009 Kan. LEXIS 9

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding it is improper to give instruction on reasonably foreseeable crimes in premeditated first-degree murder case
  • holding appellate courts must \consider the jury instructions as a whole and not isolate any one instruction in reaching a conclusion about the instruction's propriety\
  • \'The specific intent required to be proved for conviction on a premeditated first-degree murder charge is premeditation.'\
  • clearly erroneous to give modified version of PIK Crim. 3d 68.12 to jury that indicated it was unable to reach a verdict on a charge
  • PIK Crim. 3d 54.06 “reasonably foreseeable crimes” instruction improper when defendant charged with attempted first-degree premeditated murder
  • defendant prosecuted under an aiding and abetting theory must have the same specific intent to commit the specific intent crime as the principal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.