Skip to main content

State v. Washington

Citations

  • 68 P.3d 134
  • 275 Kan. 644

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • considering sua sponte the effectiveness of defense counsel at sentencing, vacating defendant’s sentence, and remanding for resentencing
  • determining defendant not in custody while he sat in victim room and could watch television
  • improper closing argument remarks in a few lines in a trial transcript over 1300 pages did not establish prejudice to fair trial rights
  • defendant has \ 'burden of proving purposeful discrimination' \ [quoting Batson , 476 U.S. at 98 , 106 S.Ct. 1712 ]
  • great deference is given to the trial judge under the third step because the findings turn upon evaluation of the prosecutors credibility
  • court instructed \'the defendant is not criminally responsible for his acts if 17 because of mental disease or defect the defendant lacked the necessary element of intent to kill'\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

41 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.