Supreme Court of Kansas· 5/31/2002

State v. Jones

Citations

47 P.3d 783
273 Kan. 756
2002 Kan. LEXIS 303

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that Ap-prendi does not apply to juvenile transfer hearings because they only determine “which system will be appropriate for a juvenile offender”
holding that Apprendi does not apply to juvenile waiver hearings because the applicable statute “does not involve guilt or innocence, but involves the determination of which system will be appropriate for a juvenile offender”
holding a violation of statute requiring a juvenile’s parents be notified of a proceeding did not rise to a constitutional violation
holding Apprendi does not apply to juvenile waiver hearings because they determine only which judicial system is appropriate for juvenile offender
prosecutor s points that expert was paid for testimony, that such arrangements may influence resulting opinion proper subject for cross-examination, closing argument
no misconduct when prosecutor made point that defendant’s expert paid for testimony; arrangement may influence what expert has to say

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.