Supreme Court of Kansas· 7/30/2010
State v. Martinez
Citations
- 236 P.3d 481
- 290 Kan. 992
- 2010 Kan. LEXIS 553
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that the combination of two unrelated harmless errors was not so prejudicial as to deny the defendant a fair trial
- finding let the victim know \she did the right thing\ by reporting the crime improper
- “There is no question the prosecutor’s closing remark injects irrelevant decision-making into the juiy process.”
- two trial errors were harmless, unrelated, and were not, in combination, so prejudicial as to deny the defendant a fair trial
- “[let the victim] know ‘she did the right thing’ [by reporting the crime]” improper
- prosecutor improperly asked jury to return guilty verdict in order to send message to child rape victim that she did right thing by reporting crime
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Biles, Johnson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
40 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas· 2014-03-07· cited 390×
- State v. ChandlerSupreme Court of Kansas· 2018-04-06· cited 299×
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Kansas· 2015-11-06· cited 152×
- State v. RosaSupreme Court of Kansas· 2016-05-27· cited 152×
- State v. HoltSupreme Court of Kansas· 2014-10-31· cited 141×
- State v. HiltSupreme Court of Kansas· 2014-04-18· cited 137×
- State v. BridgesSupreme Court of Kansas· 2013-08-09· cited 133×
- State v. CarrSupreme Court of Kansas· 2014-07-25· cited 125×
- State v. LowranceSupreme Court of Kansas· 2013-11-08· cited 106×
- State v. AkinsSupreme Court of Kansas· 2014-01-10· cited 105×
- State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Kansas· 2012-05-11· cited 104×
- State v. FryeSupreme Court of Kansas· 2012-05-04· cited 101×
- State v. HargroveCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2013-02-01· cited 90×
- State v. HolmanSupreme Court of Kansas· 2012-08-24· cited 81×
- State v. Ho K. DuongSupreme Court of Kansas· 2011-08-12· cited 76×
- State v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of Kansas· 2014-02-14· cited 75×
- State v. CameronSupreme Court of Kansas· 2012-07-27· cited 74×
- State v. InkelaarSupreme Court of Kansas· 2011-10-21· cited 73×
- State v. GillilandSupreme Court of Kansas· 2012-05-11· cited 73×
- State v. GaonaSupreme Court of Kansas· 2012-03-02· cited 70×
Cites
48 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court· 2000-06-26· cited 28,372×
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
- Washington v. RecuencoSupreme Court· 2006-06-26· cited 1,105×
- State v. KingSupreme Court of Kansas· 2009-03-27· cited 398×
- State v. GunbySupreme Court of Kansas· 2006-10-27· cited 340×
- State v. ToshSupreme Court of Kansas· 2004-06-25· cited 217×
- In re K.M.H.Supreme Court of Kansas· 2007-10-26· cited 177×
- State v. ReidSupreme Court of Kansas· 2008-06-27· cited 175×
- State v. Ortega-CadelanSupreme Court of Kansas· 2008-10-31· cited 162×
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of Kansas· 2003-01-24· cited 140×
- State v. DixonSupreme Court of Kansas· 2009-06-19· cited 131×
- State v. GantSupreme Court of Kansas· 2009-01-30· cited 102×
- State v. ReynaSupreme Court of Kansas· 2010-06-11· cited 101×
- State v. RuffSupreme Court of Kansas· 1993-03-05· cited 96×
- National Bank of Andover v. Kansas Bankers Surety Co.Supreme Court of Kansas· 2010-03-05· cited 76×
- State v. StevensSupreme Court of Kansas· 2007-12-07· cited 75×
- State v. SchowSupreme Court of Kansas· 2008-12-12· cited 75×
- State v. DanielsSupreme Court of Kansas· 2004-06-25· cited 67×
- State v. ThomasSupreme Court of Kansas· 2009-01-30· cited 66×
- State v. BoggsSupreme Court of Kansas· 2008-12-05· cited 65×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.