Supreme Court of Kansas· 12/7/2007

State v. Stevens

Citations

172 P.3d 570
285 Kan. 307
2007 Kan. LEXIS 823

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding the crime of driving under the influence is an alternative means crime before considering whether the evidence was sufficient to support both means
determining that argument that would defeat plain meaning of statute “ ‘really lies with the legislature.’ ”
finding DUI conviction was supported by evidence that defendant “was unable to satisfactorily complete the field sobriety tests”
finding DUI conviction was supported by evidence that defendant “was unable to satisfactorily complete the field sobriety tests”
affirming conviction of driving under the influence after finding substantial evidence to support alternative means of operating under the influence and attempting to operate under the influence
stating where the defendant’s conduct was “a continuing course of conduct not motivated by a fresh impulse” as opposed to multiple acts, “a further multiple acts analysis is unwarranted”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nuss, Johnson, Larson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

51 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.