Skip to main content

State v. Frye

Citations

  • 277 P.3d 1091
  • 294 Kan. 364
  • 2012 WL 1987192
  • 2012 Kan. LEXIS 247

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the sufficiency of the evidence standard is the same for bench trials and jury trials
  • noting that \the responsibility to inform a defendant of his or her jury trial right rests squarely with the presiding judge\
  • noting the fundamental right to counsel may be raised for the first time on appeal
  • “[Cjonvictions arising from bench trials and those arising from juiy trials are reviewed by this court utilizing the same standards on appeal.”
  • district court did not advise defendant of right and made no effort to ascertain whether written waiver was valid
  • the defendant submitted an undated handwritten document waiving Frye's right to a jury trial that did 9 not indicate he understood the rights waived

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

43 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.