Supreme Court of Kansas· 1/24/2003

State v. Davis

Citations

61 P.3d 701
275 Kan. 107
2003 Kan. LEXIS 20

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding prosecutor’s statement that the victim “should be believed” was based on evidence and was not vouching for the witness, thus the prosecutor was within the latitude afforded
\It is improper for a prosecutor to accuse a defendant of lying.\
“It is improper for a prosecutor to accuse a defendant of lying.”
prosecutor’s statement that victim “should be believed” based on evidence, not vouching for witness
prosecutor made reasonable inferences based on evidence in stating witness should be believed and that witness was more likely to tell truth in first police interview than second
prosecutor made reasonable inferences based on evidence in stating witness should be believed and that witness was more likely to tell truth in first police interview than second

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lockett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

94 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.