Skip to main content

State v. Marshall

Citations

  • 254 Or. App. 419
  • 295 P.3d 128
  • 2013 WL 103671
  • 2013 Ore. App. LEXIS 8

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that, where an officer falsely promised immunity in exchange for the defendant’s consent to search his RV, the “quid pro quo was apparent,” and the defendant’s “capacity for self-determination was critically impaired” such that his consent was not voluntary
  • explaining that a confession induced by a promise of leniency is involuntary and thus unconsti- tutional
  • explaining that a confession induced by a promise of leniency is involuntary and thus unconsti- tutional

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Haselton, Muniz, Ortega

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.