State v. Briggs

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the state met its burden of proving that consent was voluntary where, despite the officer’s declaratory statement—“I need to talk to the person that just ran in”—the officer’s words did not convey to the listener that she had no choice as to whether a search would occur
• “Consent [under Article I, section 9,] may be manifested by conduct as well as words.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Tennant
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-03-17· cited 11×
• State v. Stanley
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-08-23· cited 8×
• State v. Brandes
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-02-24· cited 5×
• State v. Watts
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-03-01· cited 2×
• State v. Yaeger
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-05-26· cited 2×
• Nelson v. Driver & Motor Vehicle Servs. (In re Nelson)
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-08-14· cited 1×
• State v. Tetlctle
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2026-06-17· cited 1×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Weaver
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1994-06-23· cited 67×
• State v. Dahl
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1996-05-09· cited 38×
• State v. Freund
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1990-08-01· cited 31×
• State v. Martin
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-09-03· cited 27×
• State v. Dunlap
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-09-12· cited 22×
• State v. RY
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-03-14· cited 14×
• State v. Marshall
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-01-09· cited 14×
• State v. Jepson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-12-19· cited 13×