Skip to main content

State v. Lambert

Citations

  • 265 Or. App. 742
  • 338 P.3d 160
  • 2014 Ore. App. LEXIS 1322

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that the decisive question is not whether extensive physical modifications were made to the structure but whether it is put to a new use
  • concluding that, because the “record [wa]s silent” on the question of whether police would have inevitably dis- covered the challenged evidence, the state failed to carry its burden
  • holding that we would not allow the state to develop on remand a record on inevitable discovery because the state was obligated to do so at the initial suppression hearing
  • explaining that a defendant is not required to separately, affirmatively demon- strate that the evidence obtained was also flawed because it flowed from the unlawful conduct
  • “[R]emand * * * is appropriate only if the record contains potentially conflicting evidence that needs to be resolved.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Devore, Garrett, Ortega

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.