Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 3/25/2002

State v. King

Citations

561 S.E.2d 640
349 S.C. 142
2002 S.C. App. LEXIS 38

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding an in limine motion to suppress evidence must be renewed at the time the evidence is admitted into evidence
holding an in limine motion to suppress drugs must be renewed at the time the drugs are admitted into evidence
holding an in limine motion to suppress drugs must be renewed at the time the drugs are admitted into evidence where the courts ruling was not obtained immediately prior to the admission
affirming the admission of testimony of the defendant's forty prior drug transactions dating back one year
finding confidential informant’s previous reliability -with law enforcement and first-hand knowledge of prior drug transactions at residence were sufficient to establish probable cause for search warrant
argument that is conclusory and contains no citation support is deemed abandoned

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anderson, Cureton, Goolsby

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

42 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.