Skip to main content

State v. Weston

Citations

  • 494 S.E.2d 801
  • 329 S.C. 287
  • 1997 S.C. LEXIS 221

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding a search-warrant affidavit could not have provided a substantial basis for finding probable cause for a search when \the affidavit failed to set forth any facts as to why police believed\ the defendant committed the crime
  • finding duty of reviewing court is simply to ensure that magistrate had substantial basis for concluding probable cause existed
  • stating a reviewing court should give great deference to a magistrate’s determination of probable cause
  • finding the good faith exception did not apply in a case in which the warrant affidavit failed to set forth any facts as to why police believed the defendant committed the crime
  • providing sworn oral testimony may be used to supplement search warrant affidavits
  • “A search warrant that is insufficient in itself to establish probable cause may be supplemented by sworn oral testimony.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Toal, Finney, Moore, Waller, Burnett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.