Skip to main content

State v. Mitchell

Citations

  • 498 S.E.2d 642
  • 330 S.C. 189
  • 1998 S.C. LEXIS 54

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding appellant waived an issue for appellate review because he acquiesced to the trial court's ruling
  • holding a defendant cannot complain on appeal about the circuit court's limitation of cross-examination if the defendant acquiesced to the limitation at trial
  • stating a defendant cannot acquiesce in an issue at trial and then complain about it on appeal
  • finding when an appellant acquiesces in the trial court's ruling, the issue is procedurally barred
  • where counsel acquiesces in the judge's ruling and makes no other objections regarding the issue, the issue is not preserve for appeal
  • “Unless an objection is made at the time the evidence is offered and a final ruling made, the issue is not preserved for review.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Waller, Finney, Toal, Moore, Burnett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.