State v. Dick

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Ballot Measure 10 amended OEC 609(1)(a) to delete the portion of the sentence which prescribed a weighing of probative value against prejudicial effect.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. King
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1989-01-31· cited 170×
• Boger v. Norris & Stevens, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1991-10-02· cited 10×
• State v. Bernson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1988-09-14· cited 9×
• State v. Aranda
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-04-20· cited 9×
• Elvin v. Oregon Public Employees Union
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1990-06-13· cited 8×
• State v. Venegas
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-11-03· cited 7×
• State v. Carr
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1988-06-22· cited 5×
• State v. Babb
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1988-06-22· cited 3×
• State v. Taylor
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1988-12-21· cited 2×
• State v. Archer
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1997-10-15
• State v. Cano
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-03-24

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Johns
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1986-08-26· cited 242×
• State v. McClure
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1984-12-18· cited 85×
• Marshall v. Martinson
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1974-02-14· cited 35×
• Smith v. Durant
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1975-04-01· cited 15×
• Steamboaters v. Winchester Water Control District
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1984-09-05· cited 11×
• Moore v. VOLKSWAGENWERK, AG
  D. Maryland· 1983-11-03· cited 10×
• South Benton Education Ass'n v. Monroe Union High School District 1
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1987-01-28· cited 5×
• State v. Reitz
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1985-08-21· cited 4×
• Howard v. Jammer Cycle Products, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1986-08-06· cited 2×