Court of Appeals of Oregon· 12/8/2004
State v. Miller
Citations
- 103 P.3d 112
- 196 Or. App. 354
- 2004 Ore. App. LEXIS 1621
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- mere presence at scene of manufacture of a controlled substance, analogized from mere presence at scene of crime, even with knowledge, is insufficient
- mere presence at scene of manufacture of a controlled substance, analogized from mere presence at scene of crime, even with knowledge, is insufficient
- “The inference need not inevitably follow from the established facts; rather, if the established facts support multiple reasonable inferences, the jury may decide which inference to draw.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Landau, Brewer, Armstrong
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. SummersTenth Circuit· 2005-07-21· cited 181×
- Gonzalo Dominguez v. William BarrNinth Circuit· 2020-07-21· cited 60×
- West v. Allied Signal, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-06-15· cited 20×
- State v. FriesCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-04-25· cited 14×
- State v. DerryCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-07-13· cited 11×
- State v. SeversonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-04-26· cited 9×
- State v. HennagirCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-11-09· cited 8×
- State v. MaysCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-03-18· cited 8×
- State v. O'HareCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-02-18· cited 6×
- Box v. Oregon State PoliceCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-05-12· cited 6×
- State v. SparksCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-04-29· cited 5×
- State v. NewstedCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-06-05· cited 5×
- Hammel v. McCullochCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-04-03· cited 3×
- State v. CookCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-09-17· cited 3×
- Anselmo v. Target Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-04-23· cited 3×
- State v. HendersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-11-07· cited 2×
- State v. ObeidiCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-03-14· cited 2×
- State v. RiekensCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-12-18· cited 2×
- State v. Jing Sheng ChenCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-10-29· cited 1×
- Gonzalo Dominguez v. William BarrNinth Circuit· 2020-09-18
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. BivinsCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-01-21· cited 172×
- State v. KingOregon Supreme Court· 1989-01-31· cited 170×
- State v. CervantesOregon Supreme Court· 1994-05-26· cited 131×
- State v. BoydCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1988-07-06· cited 71×
- Tose v. First Pennsylvania Bank, N. A.Supreme Court· 1981-10-13· cited 29×
- State v. AguilarCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1989-05-10· cited 16×
- State v. WrisleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1995-12-27· cited 14×
- State v. SaudeCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1989-03-01· cited 12×
- State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-07-07· cited 10×
- State v. Sosa-VasquezCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-02-17· cited 9×
- State v. MoczygembaOregon Supreme Court· 1963-03-13· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.