Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2/9/2005
State v. Stamper
Citations
- 106 P.3d 172
- 197 Or. App. 413
- 2005 Ore. App. LEXIS 132
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- observing that “we assume that the legislature did not intend any portion of its enactments to be meaningless surplusage”
- noting that “we assume that the legislature did not intend any portion of its enactments to be meaningless surplusage”
- explaining that we generally assume that the legislature “did not intend any portion of its enactments to be meaningless surplusage”
- explaining that “we assume that the leg- islature did not intend any portion of its enactments to be meaningless surplusage”
- explaining that “we assume that the leg- islature did not intend any portion of its enactments to be meaningless surplusage”
- “[W]e assume that the legislature did not intend any portion of its enactments to be meaningless surplusage.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Landau, Brewer, Armstrong
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.