Skip to main content

State v. Johnson

Citations

  • 202 P.3d 225
  • 225 Or. App. 545
  • 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 70

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reasoning that we assess the erroneously admitted or excluded evidence in light of other evidence in the record pertaining to that issue
  • “[physician’s] testimony was not merely cumulative of other, admitted evidence; rather, it contained more detailed and scientifically based information about defendant’s condition”
  • given the potential for scientifically based evidence to influence a jury generally, erroneous exclusion of scientifically based testimony of an expert weighs against a determination that error is harmless

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Landau, Schuman, Ortega

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.