Oregon Supreme Court· 4/4/1989
Powers v. Officer Cheeley
Citations
- 771 P.2d 622
- 307 Or. 585
- 1989 Ore. LEXIS 118
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- witness may not testify that, if certain testimony were given by another witness, it would be “fabrication”
- “other evidence of like effect diminishes any argument that a substantial right was affected by the [erroneously admitted evidence]”
- if contradictions in testimony alone amounted to charges of fabrication, the argument would apply in many cases and, in effect, repeal the rule of OEC 801(4)(a)(B), rewarding “the garrulous but not the reticent”
- setting out this court's cases developing the rule
- setting out this court’s cases developing the rule
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fadeley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. KellerOregon Supreme Court· 1993-01-22· cited 83×
- State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. AshleyOregon Supreme Court· 1991-10-10· cited 63×
- Honeywell v. Sterling Furniture Co.Oregon Supreme Court· 1990-08-09· cited 52×
- Perez v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2013-11-27· cited 38×
- York v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-03-24· cited 31×
- State v. OdomsOregon Supreme Court· 1992-04-02· cited 22×
- Axen v. American Home Products Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-02-10· cited 12×
- State Ex Rel. Davey v. FrankelOregon Supreme Court· 1991-12-12· cited 11×
- State of New Jersey v. Lee E. Moorer (13-09-0514, Salem County and Statewide)New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2016-12-29· cited 11×
- Propp v. LongCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-07-27· cited 8×
- State v. Villanueva-VillanuevaCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-04-30· cited 7×
- Hager v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1990-05-23· cited 4×
- State v. OdomsCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1990-12-19· cited 4×
- Bremner v. CharlesCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-09-08· cited 3×
- State v. BautistaCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-05-20· cited 3×
- Keys v. NadelOregon Supreme Court· 1997-05-22· cited 2×
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-10-07· cited 2×
- State of Iowa v. Brian James MaxwellCourt of Appeals of Iowa· 2016-11-09
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. MiddletonOregon Supreme Court· 1983-01-18· cited 320×
- State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court· 1984-07-10· cited 292×
- Di Carlo v. United StatesSecond Circuit· 1925-03-09· cited 246×
- State v. MillerOregon Supreme Court· 1985-11-05· cited 162×
- State v. HansenOregon Supreme Court· 1987-09-29· cited 156×
- State v. MilbradtOregon Supreme Court· 1988-05-17· cited 149×
- People v. . KatzNew York Court of Appeals· 1913-10-28· cited 126×
- State v. IsomOregon Supreme Court· 1988-09-21· cited 118×
- State v. MainsOregon Supreme Court· 1983-09-27· cited 64×
- Redmond v. BaxleyE.D. Michigan· 1979-09-07· cited 55×
- Maeder Steel Products Co. v. ZanelloOregon Supreme Court· 1923-11-20· cited 38×
- State v. WalgraeveOregon Supreme Court· 1966-03-16· cited 32×
- State v. HerreraOregon Supreme Court· 1963-11-06· cited 29×
- State v. CarrOregon Supreme Court· 1986-09-30· cited 26×
- Pearson v. GalvinOregon Supreme Court· 1969-05-16· cited 22×
- Roach v. HockeyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1981-08-31· cited 11×
- Livestock Transportation, Inc. v. AshbaughCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1983-07-27· cited 2×
- Powers v. CheeleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1988-10-05· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.