State v. Remme

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• to be permissible, the Cite as 301 Or App 59 (2019) 67 witness’s testimony “must assist, not supplant, the jury’s assessment of credibility”
• the state’s concession of error, the significance of the error to the defendant’s liberty interest, and the ease of correction on remand
• testimony that assists but does not supplant jury’s credibility assessments is not vouching
• “[I]t is one thing to educate the jury about an unusual phenomenon bearing on credi- bility, but it [is] quite another to ‘connect the dots’ explicitly 36 Manning v. Kelly * * *. * * * At least the last ‘dot’ must be left ‘unconnected.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).